Adrian Berry  
Science author and columnist   
Home | About Adrian | Subjects | Contact Me | Reviews | Links 
 

The Cosmic Bard

When Othello complains that the Moon ``comes more near to the Earth than she was wont, and makes men mad'', one gets the feeling that astronomy was not Shakespeare's strongest subject.

But Hamlet gives a very different impression. A recent study of the play finds it filled with astronomical references which add up to an engrossing detective story.

The guard Barnardo, patrolling the castle battlements just before the appearance of the ghost, remarks: ``Last night of all, when yon same star that's westward from the pole has made his course to illumine that part of heaven where now it burns....'' And we know he is pointing at Capella.


Shakespear - indifferent to science?


How do we know this? Because it is November. and about midnight, when Capella, the sixth brightest star in the sky, has passed west of the celestial pole.

But how can we be sure it is November?

It cannot be later in the year because Hamlet says his father was murdered only two months before while dozing in an orchard. In Denmark few people would sleep out of doors except in summer or early autumn. And it cannot be earlier because another guard calls the night ``bitter cold.''

In all his other plays Shakespeare seems indifferent to science in general, and to astronomy in particular, but not so in Hamlet. Why the exception?

There are two possible reasons. The play was written in 1601, and two events had happened before this that might have persuaded Shakespeare that the night sky was far more interesting than he had hitherto imagined.

The first was the supernova of 1572, later called ``Tycho's Star'' because Tycho Brahe described it in such detail. Shakespeare was only eight years old at the time, and it must have made as great an impression on him as it did on the rest of Europe. It was the first bright supernova to be seen in more than 500 years. The Lord High Treasurer Lord Burghley even consulted astronomers about its religious and political significance.

The second event occurred some time in the 1580s, when Shakespeare met Giordano Bruno, the prophet of planets beyond the solar system, in a London printing shop.

Bruno was a loquacious talker, especially on his favourite subject, and it can be presumed that they had a long conversation. It must have revived Shakespeare's memory of the supernova, and it could have given him the idea of including Capella in his new play.

No one of course knows what Shakespeare and Bruno talked about in the printing ship. (It could have been the shortcomings of the clergy, another of Bruno's favourite subjects).

But assume it was the stars. This could explain Shakespeare's choice of Capella, a star fairly near the position of the long-vanished supernova.

And it could explain why the action of the play begins in November. It was in that month that the supernova had first appeared.

While there is no proof that Shakespeare had a part of his mind on astronomy when he wrote Hamlet, the idea might explain other things in the play - like the wild statement by the stolid and unimaginative Horatio that the Moon is ``sick almost to doomsday with eclipse.''

Home | About Adrian | Subjects | Contact Me | Reviews | Links