|
In a curious fashion that would have delighted Jung, these two
long-term projects are bound together. Each depends for its
success on the success of the other.
For nuclear fusion, burning hydrogen until it
releases energy, will not be absolutely safe. It will produce
bursts of neutrons and make the protective walls of the machine
radioactive.
The answer to this problem is not to use
hydrogen, but rather helium-3, an isotope of the second lightest
element in the universe. Burning helium-3 cannot produce neutrons
and it will make fusion power truly safe.
Unfortunately––or perhaps fortunately for
space enthusiasts––helium-3 is extremely rare on Earth, and
collecting it on this planet for use in fusion reactors would be
prohibitively expensive.
But helium-3 exists in abundance on the Moon.
Found in rocks returned by the Apollo astronauts, it is contained
in the solar wind that has battered the airless lunar surface for
billions of years, while unable to penetrate our atmosphere.
A single spaceship's load of 25 tons of this
substance could provide all of Europe's needs for a year, and a
million tons of it could power the entire planet for thousands of
years, even with a population exceeding 10 billion people.
It could also power the engines of fast
interplanetary spaceships, making it unnecessary to build such
spacecraft on Earth, a project that has always aroused nervousness
of people fearing an explosion during launch.
``The Moon could be the Persian Gulf of the
21st century, with helium-3 as its cash crop,''' says Gerald
Kulcinski, professor of nuclear engineering and director of the
Fusion Technology Institute at Wisconsin University. ``On Earth,
you could safely build a helium-3 reactor in the middle of a big
city.''
The concurrence of these two events is
extraordinary. For nearly 20 years the Culham reactor consumed
more energy than it produced, and critics began to call the
project a waste of money. And for more than that time, since the
end of Apollo, the Moon attracted no attention at all. Then,
suddenly, both situations changed.
But the ``coincidence'' may itself be nothing but a
coincidence! All the evidence I know of suggests that the universe
is ruled only by cause and effect. In 1913, Jung proposed his
theory of coincidences to his mentor Sigmund Freud. The latter
disagreed furiously, and the two men never spoke to each other
again. |