|
What is fascinating is how people reacted to
past eclipses in epochs before their causes were known. They
always assumed that they sprung from political events. In 733, the
Anglo Saxon Chronicle reported in a matter of fact tone:
``In this year Aethelbald captured Somerton; and the Sun was
eclipsed, and all the Sun's disc was like a black shield; and Acca
was driven from his bishopric." One can imagine the
indignation Acca must have felt that the heavens should have
connived at his expulsion.
The Chronic der Seuchen said of the same
eclipse: ``One year after the Arabs had been driven back across
the Pyrenees [into Spain] after the Battle of Tours, the Sun was
so much darkened on the 19th of August as to excite universal
terror." This presumably meant that people saw the eclipse as
a sign that the Arabs were returning for reconquest. They didn't––which
must have left the forecasters of doom feeling foolish.
One reason why total solar eclipses might have
appeared to have a supernatural cause is that they happen with
such randomness. Some places get many of them, while other places
hardly any. They seem to shun Britain's southern metropolitan
areas. Mr Williams has discovered that, in the 3,000 years of his
survey, London, Dover and Dublin will have an average of eight,
while Penzance, the Scilly Islands, York, the Orkneys and
Shetlands each are due to average 19.
In 1339, the Orkneys and Shetlands had the
strangest total eclipse on record. It passed between the two
groups of islands without touching either. The path of totality
was less than a mile wide, and it lasted only a second!
Every habitable planet in the galaxy will have
its own distinct style of solar eclipse––if indeed they have
moons as large as ours to eclipse their suns. Because the Sun and
Moon have almost the same apparent size (because the Sun is about
400 times larger than the Moon, and at the same time 400 times
further away) a terrestrial solar eclipse, surrounded by its thin
"ring of fire", may be unique to Earth. |