| on the screen is
extraordinary. It looks as if someone or something is searching at great
speed and thoroughness though miles of filing cabinets.
What is really happening, of course, is that the
computer is performing an FFT, a fast Fourier transform. I seek guidance
about this from the SETI home page and am told: "This is a complex
mathematical operation that turns a set of time-based data into a set of
frequency-based data. For more information on the FFT, please consult a
book on digital signal processing".
But what is really remarkable is until a few years
ago all this work was performed by NASA supercomputers. In those days
our chief worry was that Congress might cancel the project - which
it eventually did, and it was privatised. From the pronouncements of
politicians it was clear that this might happen. Former Senator William
Proxmire called SETI "crazy science fiction which should be
postponed for a few million light years", a statement that led the
late Isaac Asimov to deduce that Proxmire was "bone from ear to
ear".
And I have this gem from an unnamed Congressman:
"Of course there are flying saucers and advanced civilisations in
outer space. But we don't need to spend millions to find evidence of
these rascally creatures. We need only 75 cents to buy a tabloid at the
local supermarket. Conclusive evidence of these crafty critters can be
found at checkout counters from coast to coast."
And a few years ago the UK Cutty Sark Scotch Whisky
Company offered a prize of £1 million to anyone who could find an alien
spacecraft and bring it at their own expense to the London Science
Museum to be verified by unnamed `experts'. The main problem was how the
winner should bring a vehicle that presumably would weigh tens of
thousands of tons into Central London without knocking down buildings,
and whether this would cost more than the prize money.
But at last the SETI project is free from the whims of idiots and on
ordinary peoples' hard disks. And the person whose computer finds an
alien signal will be publicly named. So I have a one in 1.3 million
chance of being listed in an encyclopedia of famous scientists.
|